<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ethics - Talk Science To Me</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.talksciencetome.com/tag/ethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.talksciencetome.com</link>
	<description>When science has a story</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 18:45:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">159279938</site>	<item>
		<title>English, science, and the editor as advocate</title>
		<link>https://www.talksciencetome.com/2014/12/22/book-review-science-need-global-language/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 19:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advocacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.tstmarchive.talksciencetome.com/?p=1801</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>At a recent meeting of the BC branch of the Editors’ Association of Canada, a panel discussed the role of editors in ensuring accessibility to information. One of the final questions asked was, “Are editors advocates?” I think that yes, we absolutely are. But here’s another question: What are we advocates for? There are some&#8230;&#160;<a href="https://www.talksciencetome.com/2014/12/22/book-review-science-need-global-language/" rel="bookmark">Read More &#187;<span class="screen-reader-text">English, science, and the editor as advocate</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.talksciencetome.com/2014/12/22/book-review-science-need-global-language/">English, science, and the editor as advocate</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.talksciencetome.com">Talk Science To Me</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1801</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The uBiome controversy</title>
		<link>https://www.talksciencetome.com/2013/03/14/the-ubiome-controversy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jakob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizen science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.tstmarchive.talksciencetome.com/?p=556</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>uBiome is a cool project serving a widely recognized need: the mapping of the human microbiome. We’ve posted about uBiome on Twitter and Facebook, and have generally been pretty jazzed about the enterprise. Our enthusiasm took a major hit, however, when Melissa Bates and other bloggers began to voice serious concerns about the ethical oversight&#8230;&#160;<a href="https://www.talksciencetome.com/2013/03/14/the-ubiome-controversy/" rel="bookmark">Read More &#187;<span class="screen-reader-text">The uBiome controversy</span></a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.talksciencetome.com/2013/03/14/the-ubiome-controversy/">The uBiome controversy</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.talksciencetome.com">Talk Science To Me</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">556</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Image permission: Doing it right</title>
		<link>https://www.talksciencetome.com/2013/02/15/image-permission-doing-it-right/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jakob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 21:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Science communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creative commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.tstmarchive.talksciencetome.com/?p=478</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Whether you’re putting together a permanent exhibit or a last-minute powerpoint, it’s all but inevitable that you’ll encounter a point at which the most sensible option is to use material that someone else created. This is more frequently the case with images since they’re usually harder to recreate yourself. And in the age of Google Images and instant screenshots, there’s almost nothing in practical terms that can stop you from using any picture you want. Here at Talk Science however, we recommend being careful with your media usage— and we negotiate image permission for many of our clients.</p>
<p>There are some misconceptions about this. Some people seem to think that the fact that an image has been posted online, or even published at all, makes it fair game. Or that simple attribution (like citing a published text) is sufficient, with no need to consult the originator. Or that all images are freely available for non-commercial use. None of these is the case—the last is true of specific Creative Commons licenses, but not all. And while we’re at it, you don’t need to mail yourself anything in order to secure rights to work that you’ve created.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.talksciencetome.com/2013/02/15/image-permission-doing-it-right/">Image permission: Doing it right</a> first appeared on <a href="https://www.talksciencetome.com">Talk Science To Me</a>.</p>]]></description>
		
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">478</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
